lohud.com

Sponsored by:

In Focus: Rockland

More from the opinion-makers of The Journal News and LoHud.com — with a special look at Rockland.

Bridge suspension

May
28

So, here we are, on May 28, three days left in the month, and no big announcement by the Tappan Zee Bridge/Interstate 287 Project Team on its “preferred alternative” plans for the 30-mile corridor that stretches from Suffern to Port Chester. The Department of Transportation-led team had planned to announce its favored mass transit component for the highway overhaul by the end of May. That would be Saturday. That announcement would include what was planned for the Tappan Zee Bridge, from replacing it to adding on to it to building it a buddy-bridge to rehabbing it. Big stuff.

But we won’t hear this month.

I checked on the status of the big announcement with Yvette Hines, deputy director of outreach and community development for the New York State Department of Transportation (or as she said, “DOT spokesman is fine”). She said a few weeks, or the next several weeks. That would mean June? Hines talked about all the variables, including updated financial forecasting and reviewing the impact of the Access to the Region’s Core, or ARC tunnel, that will bring NJTransit trains directly to the West Side.

She also pointed to the hundreds of comments that the Project Team received before the March 31 public comment period closed. Hines said the comments were intricate, with many ideas and angles included in most of the submissions. “We have a sophisticated stakeholder base,” she said. “If someone takes the time to write a 10-page comment,” she noted, that needs to get attention. Each comment, she said, “we consider and address.”

So, we’ll hear all about it in June—after all, the month has four full weeks and two days. Guess I should add a voiceover to our video editorial, “The Road Ahead,” that discusses the plans for the TZ/I-287 corridor and the region’s future transportation needs. Or, just pretend you hear “some time in June” rather than “in late May.”

This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 28th, 2008 at 2:39 pm by Nancy Cutler.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Share and Enjoy: del.icio.us Digg | Print Print | Email Email

Advertisement

One Response to “Bridge suspension”

  1. Steve C.

    of course not. they want it to fall down and cost so much to patch fix it. that they will get what they always wanted and build a new bridge so they can tax the SNOT Out of us.

Leave a Reply

About this blog
Welcome to the community conversation/editorial page blog. It's your place for two-way talk with the people behind the opinions on the TJN editorial pages and LoHud.com. Look here daily to talk back to the opinion writers, find out what's on our agenda, and steer us to the hot topics in your community. Contributing to this blog are deep-rooted Rocklanders Nancy Cutler, editorial page editor in Rockland, and Bob Baird, longtime Rockland columnist and editor, along with Tracey Princiotta, interactivity editor, with occasional contributions from other opinion staff.

Subscribe

Get blog updates via email:






The Authors

Other recent entries

Links




Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives